I believe 406 by 228 cm is not the correct screen size of iPad. the physical screen size can be measured with a ruler.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 2:47 AM 'Mike Day' via Beta <[email protected]> wrote: > For Chris and Bill, I think. > > Best to confirm what I implied earlier... I haven’t (knowingly) altered > the laptop’s setup before or since installing J904 beta. I’ve had this HP > Envy for 2-3 years. > > I see that scale is set to 125% (Recommended) > Resolution is 1920x1080 > Landscape > > As for Bill’s remark, > > wd’qscreen’ returns (warning - I’m eye-copying from laptop to this iPad as > I can’t easily email from the iPad here, away from home WiFi) > > 406 228 1536 864 96 96 32 1 2147483647 96 96 135 > > I note that 1.25 * 72 = 90, not 96 . But Bill seemed unhappy with 72 > anyway. > > If you need more information, it might be better if I send photos or PDFs > of the laptop’s screen with relevant contents. > > Cheers, > > Mike > > Sent from my iPad > > > On 14 Apr 2022, at 16:32, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > wd'qscreen' > > > > 508 317 1440 900 72 72 24 1 2147483647 72 72 101 > > > > the first 2 numbers are dimension n mm > > > > 3rd and 4th are pixel sixe > > > > 72 is dpi > > > > > > but this result is incorrect because screen spec should be 13.3-inch > > (diagonal) LED-backlit display with IPS technology; 2560-by-1600 native > > resolution at 227 pixels therefore screen size should 286 by 180 mm > > > > > > I'm not sure how to get the correct result from Qt. > > > >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 10:54 PM chris burke <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Do you have a High-DPI monitor? I have, and scale it to Double. > >> > >> Is this a problem on non High-DPI monitors? > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 7:32 AM 'Mike Day' via Beta <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Thanks for confirming my report, Chris. No suggestions, I’m afraid. > >> I’m > >>> just a humble user. > >>> > >>> Having said that, I’ve nevertheless Googled Windows difference between > QT > >>> 6 & QT 5, and have found this remark: which might be pertinent: > >>> “High-DPI > >>> Qt 6 supports high-DPI displays on all platforms, and will > automatically > >>> account for the display resolution when using higher level APIs such as > >> Qt > >>> Widgets or Qt Quick. Applications only need to provide high-resolution > >>> assets, such as images and icons. The feature is always enabled. > >>> > >>> Qt 6 changes the default scale factor rounding policy from > >>> Qt::HighDpiScaleFactorRoundingPolicy::Round to > >>> Qt::HighDpiScaleFactorRoundingPolicy::PassThrough in order to track > >>> operating system DPI settings accurately. Applications that use Qt > >> Widgets > >>> may encounter graphical glitches at non-integer scale factors, for > >> example > >>> on Windows with a display configured for 175%. In that case, set the > >>> rounding policy to Round to restore Qt 5 behavior” > >>> > >>> This is at https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/portingguide.html > >>> > >>> You might possibly find it useful! > >>> > >>> Cheers > >>> > >>> Mike > >>> > >>> Sent from my iPad > >>> > >>>> On 14 Apr 2022, at 03:27, chris burke <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I also see a change in the term and edit windows sizes, but don't > >>>> understand it. > >>>> > >>>> I don't know of any relevant change in the Jqt source. It could be > >>> because > >>>> of the upgrade from Qt 5 to Qt 6, but I don't see anything in the Qt 6 > >>>> release notes. > >>>> > >>>> Any suggestions? > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 8:17 AM 'Michael Day' via Beta < > >>> [email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I noticed this feature almost as soon as J904 was installed, but > have > >>>>> only just got round to > >>>>> trying to deal with it. > >>>>> > >>>>> The puzzling feature is the apparent increase in the size of JQt > >> session > >>>>> windows, under Windows 11 > >>>>> in my case, compared with many previous versions. I've been using > >>>>> this setting for the default size > >>>>> and location of session windows in ~user/config/qtide.cfg for some > >>>>> time now: > >>>>> > >>>>> # J903 > >>>>> [Position] > >>>>> Debug=-590 50 540 500 > >>>>> Edit=31 32 1806 853 > >>>>> Term=40 22 1784 858 > >>>>> (The gratuitous non-rounding probably means I'd managed to capture > the > >>>>> session windows' properties > >>>>> once upon a time!) > >>>>> > >>>>> For versions up to J903, this results in windows more or less > >> filling > >>>>> the screen, nominally 1920x1080, > >>>>> allowing a smallish view of the "desktop" between J and the task-bar, > >>>>> where jbreak.bat is usually > >>>>> visible! > >>>>> > >>>>> Now, in J904, the term and edit windows both stretch too far to the > >>>>> right and too far down. I > >>>>> was getting round the problem by changing size with the "mouse." > >>>>> > >>>>> I've now experimented with the settings; the following achieves > >>>>> windows with top left corners > >>>>> very similar in position to those with J903, and bottom right > corners > >>>>> fairly near the J903 ones. > >>>>> > >>>>> # J904 beta > >>>>> [Position] > >>>>> Debug=-590 50 540 500 > >>>>> Edit=31 32 1450 700 > >>>>> Term=40 22 1400 650 > >>>>> > >>>>> This version of Qt appears not to recognise the screen's physical > >>>>> dimensions, perhaps. > >>>>> > >>>>> Also, the font sizes in the Edit Window bars are larger than before. > >>>>> That is, the edit file name, > >>>>> eg "User/config/qtide.cfg - [User] - Edit" > >>>>> as well as action tabs: > >>>>> File Edit View etc .............. > >>>>> and file tabs: > >>>>> qtide.cfg | p788.ijs | maze.ijs | polydiv.ijs | etc......... > >>>>> This isn't a problem for me, but might have diagnostic value. > >>>>> > >>>>> As before, the version details are: > >>>>> JVERSION > >>>>> Engine: j904/j64avx2/windows > >>>>> Beta-b: commercial/2022-04-12T18:59:13 > >>>>> Library: 9.04.01 > >>>>> Qt IDE: 2.0.3/6.2.4(6.2.4) > >>>>> Platform: Win 64 > >>>>> Installer: J904 install > >>>>> InstallPath: c:/d/j904-beta > >>>>> Contact: www.jsoftware.com > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks again, > >>>>> > >>>>> MIke > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > >>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus > >>>>> > >>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> For information about J forums see > >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >>>>> > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> For information about J forums see > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >>> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
