Is the result of wd'qscreen' reasonable on the laptop? On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 at 10:57 PM 'Mike Day' via Beta <[email protected]> wrote:
> Very sorry, Bill! I was only writing & sending on this iPad because it’s > configured to send emails from this house, away from home, with limited > WiFi. I haven't worked out how to easily send emails from the Windows > laptop when we’re away. > > So I was trying to report the wd’qscreen’ result as given by my laptop. > (The iPad can’t run Ian’s J902 as its iOS is too old!) > > Confused? You won’t be once you .... > > Cheers, > > Mike > > Sent from my iPad > > > On 15 Apr 2022, at 12:49, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I believe 406 by 228 cm is not the correct screen size of iPad. > > the physical screen size can be measured with a ruler. > > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 2:47 AM 'Mike Day' via Beta <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> For Chris and Bill, I think. > >> > >> Best to confirm what I implied earlier... I haven’t (knowingly) altered > >> the laptop’s setup before or since installing J904 beta. I’ve had this > HP > >> Envy for 2-3 years. > >> > >> I see that scale is set to 125% (Recommended) > >> Resolution is 1920x1080 > >> Landscape > >> > >> As for Bill’s remark, > >> > >> wd’qscreen’ returns (warning - I’m eye-copying from laptop to this iPad > as > >> I can’t easily email from the iPad here, away from home WiFi) > >> > >> 406 228 1536 864 96 96 32 1 2147483647 96 96 135 > >> > >> I note that 1.25 * 72 = 90, not 96 . But Bill seemed unhappy with 72 > >> anyway. > >> > >> If you need more information, it might be better if I send photos or > PDFs > >> of the laptop’s screen with relevant contents. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Mike > >> > >> Sent from my iPad > >> > >>> On 14 Apr 2022, at 16:32, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> wd'qscreen' > >>> > >>> 508 317 1440 900 72 72 24 1 2147483647 72 72 101 > >>> > >>> the first 2 numbers are dimension n mm > >>> > >>> 3rd and 4th are pixel sixe > >>> > >>> 72 is dpi > >>> > >>> > >>> but this result is incorrect because screen spec should be 13.3-inch > >>> (diagonal) LED-backlit display with IPS technology; 2560-by-1600 native > >>> resolution at 227 pixels therefore screen size should 286 by 180 mm > >>> > >>> > >>> I'm not sure how to get the correct result from Qt. > >>> > >>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 10:54 PM chris burke <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Do you have a High-DPI monitor? I have, and scale it to Double. > >>>> > >>>> Is this a problem on non High-DPI monitors? > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 7:32 AM 'Mike Day' via Beta < > [email protected] > >>> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Thanks for confirming my report, Chris. No suggestions, I’m afraid. > >>>> I’m > >>>>> just a humble user. > >>>>> > >>>>> Having said that, I’ve nevertheless Googled Windows difference > between > >> QT > >>>>> 6 & QT 5, and have found this remark: which might be pertinent: > >>>>> “High-DPI > >>>>> Qt 6 supports high-DPI displays on all platforms, and will > >> automatically > >>>>> account for the display resolution when using higher level APIs such > as > >>>> Qt > >>>>> Widgets or Qt Quick. Applications only need to provide > high-resolution > >>>>> assets, such as images and icons. The feature is always enabled. > >>>>> > >>>>> Qt 6 changes the default scale factor rounding policy from > >>>>> Qt::HighDpiScaleFactorRoundingPolicy::Round to > >>>>> Qt::HighDpiScaleFactorRoundingPolicy::PassThrough in order to track > >>>>> operating system DPI settings accurately. Applications that use Qt > >>>> Widgets > >>>>> may encounter graphical glitches at non-integer scale factors, for > >>>> example > >>>>> on Windows with a display configured for 175%. In that case, set the > >>>>> rounding policy to Round to restore Qt 5 behavior” > >>>>> > >>>>> This is at https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/portingguide.html > >>>>> > >>>>> You might possibly find it useful! > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers > >>>>> > >>>>> Mike > >>>>> > >>>>> Sent from my iPad > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 14 Apr 2022, at 03:27, chris burke <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I also see a change in the term and edit windows sizes, but don't > >>>>>> understand it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I don't know of any relevant change in the Jqt source. It could be > >>>>> because > >>>>>> of the upgrade from Qt 5 to Qt 6, but I don't see anything in the > Qt 6 > >>>>>> release notes. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Any suggestions? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 8:17 AM 'Michael Day' via Beta < > >>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I noticed this feature almost as soon as J904 was installed, but > >> have > >>>>>>> only just got round to > >>>>>>> trying to deal with it. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The puzzling feature is the apparent increase in the size of JQt > >>>> session > >>>>>>> windows, under Windows 11 > >>>>>>> in my case, compared with many previous versions. I've been > using > >>>>>>> this setting for the default size > >>>>>>> and location of session windows in ~user/config/qtide.cfg for > some > >>>>>>> time now: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> # J903 > >>>>>>> [Position] > >>>>>>> Debug=-590 50 540 500 > >>>>>>> Edit=31 32 1806 853 > >>>>>>> Term=40 22 1784 858 > >>>>>>> (The gratuitous non-rounding probably means I'd managed to capture > >> the > >>>>>>> session windows' properties > >>>>>>> once upon a time!) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> For versions up to J903, this results in windows more or less > >>>> filling > >>>>>>> the screen, nominally 1920x1080, > >>>>>>> allowing a smallish view of the "desktop" between J and the > task-bar, > >>>>>>> where jbreak.bat is usually > >>>>>>> visible! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Now, in J904, the term and edit windows both stretch too far to > the > >>>>>>> right and too far down. I > >>>>>>> was getting round the problem by changing size with the "mouse." > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I've now experimented with the settings; the following achieves > >>>>>>> windows with top left corners > >>>>>>> very similar in position to those with J903, and bottom right > >> corners > >>>>>>> fairly near the J903 ones. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> # J904 beta > >>>>>>> [Position] > >>>>>>> Debug=-590 50 540 500 > >>>>>>> Edit=31 32 1450 700 > >>>>>>> Term=40 22 1400 650 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> This version of Qt appears not to recognise the screen's physical > >>>>>>> dimensions, perhaps. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Also, the font sizes in the Edit Window bars are larger than > before. > >>>>>>> That is, the edit file name, > >>>>>>> eg "User/config/qtide.cfg - [User] - Edit" > >>>>>>> as well as action tabs: > >>>>>>> File Edit View etc .............. > >>>>>>> and file tabs: > >>>>>>> qtide.cfg | p788.ijs | maze.ijs | polydiv.ijs | etc......... > >>>>>>> This isn't a problem for me, but might have diagnostic value. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> As before, the version details are: > >>>>>>> JVERSION > >>>>>>> Engine: j904/j64avx2/windows > >>>>>>> Beta-b: commercial/2022-04-12T18:59:13 > >>>>>>> Library: 9.04.01 > >>>>>>> Qt IDE: 2.0.3/6.2.4(6.2.4) > >>>>>>> Platform: Win 64 > >>>>>>> Installer: J904 install > >>>>>>> InstallPath: c:/d/j904-beta > >>>>>>> Contact: www.jsoftware.com > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks again, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> MIke > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus > software. > >>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>> For information about J forums see > >>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>> For information about J forums see > >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> For information about J forums see > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >>>>> > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> For information about J forums see > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >>>> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
