I don’t know. Just following your example. Perhaps Chris understands! NB I did also report screen status (on the laptop) as provided by Windows Settings.
Mike Sent from my iPad > On 15 Apr 2022, at 16:06, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is the result of wd'qscreen' reasonable on the laptop? > > On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 at 10:57 PM 'Mike Day' via Beta <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Very sorry, Bill! I was only writing & sending on this iPad because it’s >> configured to send emails from this house, away from home, with limited >> WiFi. I haven't worked out how to easily send emails from the Windows >> laptop when we’re away. >> >> So I was trying to report the wd’qscreen’ result as given by my laptop. >> (The iPad can’t run Ian’s J902 as its iOS is too old!) >> >> Confused? You won’t be once you .... >> >> Cheers, >> >> Mike >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On 15 Apr 2022, at 12:49, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I believe 406 by 228 cm is not the correct screen size of iPad. >>> the physical screen size can be measured with a ruler. >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 2:47 AM 'Mike Day' via Beta <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> For Chris and Bill, I think. >>>> >>>> Best to confirm what I implied earlier... I haven’t (knowingly) altered >>>> the laptop’s setup before or since installing J904 beta. I’ve had this >> HP >>>> Envy for 2-3 years. >>>> >>>> I see that scale is set to 125% (Recommended) >>>> Resolution is 1920x1080 >>>> Landscape >>>> >>>> As for Bill’s remark, >>>> >>>> wd’qscreen’ returns (warning - I’m eye-copying from laptop to this iPad >> as >>>> I can’t easily email from the iPad here, away from home WiFi) >>>> >>>> 406 228 1536 864 96 96 32 1 2147483647 96 96 135 >>>> >>>> I note that 1.25 * 72 = 90, not 96 . But Bill seemed unhappy with 72 >>>> anyway. >>>> >>>> If you need more information, it might be better if I send photos or >> PDFs >>>> of the laptop’s screen with relevant contents. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Mike >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPad >>>> >>>>> On 14 Apr 2022, at 16:32, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> wd'qscreen' >>>>> >>>>> 508 317 1440 900 72 72 24 1 2147483647 72 72 101 >>>>> >>>>> the first 2 numbers are dimension n mm >>>>> >>>>> 3rd and 4th are pixel sixe >>>>> >>>>> 72 is dpi >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> but this result is incorrect because screen spec should be 13.3-inch >>>>> (diagonal) LED-backlit display with IPS technology; 2560-by-1600 native >>>>> resolution at 227 pixels therefore screen size should 286 by 180 mm >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm not sure how to get the correct result from Qt. >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 10:54 PM chris burke <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you have a High-DPI monitor? I have, and scale it to Double. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is this a problem on non High-DPI monitors? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 7:32 AM 'Mike Day' via Beta < >> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for confirming my report, Chris. No suggestions, I’m afraid. >>>>>> I’m >>>>>>> just a humble user. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Having said that, I’ve nevertheless Googled Windows difference >> between >>>> QT >>>>>>> 6 & QT 5, and have found this remark: which might be pertinent: >>>>>>> “High-DPI >>>>>>> Qt 6 supports high-DPI displays on all platforms, and will >>>> automatically >>>>>>> account for the display resolution when using higher level APIs such >> as >>>>>> Qt >>>>>>> Widgets or Qt Quick. Applications only need to provide >> high-resolution >>>>>>> assets, such as images and icons. The feature is always enabled. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Qt 6 changes the default scale factor rounding policy from >>>>>>> Qt::HighDpiScaleFactorRoundingPolicy::Round to >>>>>>> Qt::HighDpiScaleFactorRoundingPolicy::PassThrough in order to track >>>>>>> operating system DPI settings accurately. Applications that use Qt >>>>>> Widgets >>>>>>> may encounter graphical glitches at non-integer scale factors, for >>>>>> example >>>>>>> on Windows with a display configured for 175%. In that case, set the >>>>>>> rounding policy to Round to restore Qt 5 behavior” >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is at https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/portingguide.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You might possibly find it useful! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Mike >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sent from my iPad >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 14 Apr 2022, at 03:27, chris burke <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I also see a change in the term and edit windows sizes, but don't >>>>>>>> understand it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't know of any relevant change in the Jqt source. It could be >>>>>>> because >>>>>>>> of the upgrade from Qt 5 to Qt 6, but I don't see anything in the >> Qt 6 >>>>>>>> release notes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any suggestions? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 8:17 AM 'Michael Day' via Beta < >>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I noticed this feature almost as soon as J904 was installed, but >>>> have >>>>>>>>> only just got round to >>>>>>>>> trying to deal with it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The puzzling feature is the apparent increase in the size of JQt >>>>>> session >>>>>>>>> windows, under Windows 11 >>>>>>>>> in my case, compared with many previous versions. I've been >> using >>>>>>>>> this setting for the default size >>>>>>>>> and location of session windows in ~user/config/qtide.cfg for >> some >>>>>>>>> time now: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> # J903 >>>>>>>>> [Position] >>>>>>>>> Debug=-590 50 540 500 >>>>>>>>> Edit=31 32 1806 853 >>>>>>>>> Term=40 22 1784 858 >>>>>>>>> (The gratuitous non-rounding probably means I'd managed to capture >>>> the >>>>>>>>> session windows' properties >>>>>>>>> once upon a time!) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For versions up to J903, this results in windows more or less >>>>>> filling >>>>>>>>> the screen, nominally 1920x1080, >>>>>>>>> allowing a smallish view of the "desktop" between J and the >> task-bar, >>>>>>>>> where jbreak.bat is usually >>>>>>>>> visible! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Now, in J904, the term and edit windows both stretch too far to >> the >>>>>>>>> right and too far down. I >>>>>>>>> was getting round the problem by changing size with the "mouse." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I've now experimented with the settings; the following achieves >>>>>>>>> windows with top left corners >>>>>>>>> very similar in position to those with J903, and bottom right >>>> corners >>>>>>>>> fairly near the J903 ones. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> # J904 beta >>>>>>>>> [Position] >>>>>>>>> Debug=-590 50 540 500 >>>>>>>>> Edit=31 32 1450 700 >>>>>>>>> Term=40 22 1400 650 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This version of Qt appears not to recognise the screen's physical >>>>>>>>> dimensions, perhaps. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Also, the font sizes in the Edit Window bars are larger than >> before. >>>>>>>>> That is, the edit file name, >>>>>>>>> eg "User/config/qtide.cfg - [User] - Edit" >>>>>>>>> as well as action tabs: >>>>>>>>> File Edit View etc .............. >>>>>>>>> and file tabs: >>>>>>>>> qtide.cfg | p788.ijs | maze.ijs | polydiv.ijs | etc......... >>>>>>>>> This isn't a problem for me, but might have diagnostic value. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As before, the version details are: >>>>>>>>> JVERSION >>>>>>>>> Engine: j904/j64avx2/windows >>>>>>>>> Beta-b: commercial/2022-04-12T18:59:13 >>>>>>>>> Library: 9.04.01 >>>>>>>>> Qt IDE: 2.0.3/6.2.4(6.2.4) >>>>>>>>> Platform: Win 64 >>>>>>>>> Installer: J904 install >>>>>>>>> InstallPath: c:/d/j904-beta >>>>>>>>> Contact: www.jsoftware.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks again, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> MIke >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus >> software. >>>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> For information about J forums see >>>>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> For information about J forums see >>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>>>>>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> For information about J forums see >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>>>>>> >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> For information about J forums see >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>>>>> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
