>it would be much smarter to have SBS use the biggest resolution or at >least filesize rather than the arbitrary alphabetical way. if it were >that way, i wouldn't even need to set "Folder.jpg" as the name to look >for. That would mean a slower scan time, as it would need to look at the content of each file, and potentially could crash on files that it wouldn't normally use.
And the file with the largest resolution isn't necessarily the right one anyway. eg. I have a few albums with the booklet pages scanned (i.e. front and back joined as one image), which would have a larger resolution than the cover art. _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
