Philip Meyer;504918 Wrote: > >it would be much smarter to have SBS use the biggest resolution or at > >least filesize rather than the arbitrary alphabetical way. if it > were > >that way, i wouldn't even need to set "Folder.jpg" as the name to > look > >for. > That would mean a slower scan time, as it would need to look at the > content of each file, and potentially could crash on files that it > wouldn't normally use.
not necessarily... looking for biggest filesize is no different than looking for first alphabetical filename. i suspect thats also true of resolution, as thats known to the OS as well, but i'm not positive on that. Philip Meyer;504918 Wrote: > And the file with the largest resolution isn't necessarily the right one > anyway. eg. I have a few albums with the booklet pages scanned (i.e. > front and back joined as one image), which would have a larger > resolution than the cover art. for the very few who do anything like that, they can and already do specify the filename, so no difference. -- MrSinatra www.lion-radio.org using: sb2 & sbc (my home) / sbr (parent's home) - sbs 7.5b - win xp pro sp3 ie8 - p4(ht) 3.2ghz / 2gig ram - 1tb wd usb2 raid1 - d-link dir-655 - 35k mp3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ MrSinatra's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2336 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=71768 _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
