>andy, that isn't true. for example, WMP puts four files in with every >rip, two are 200x200 while the other two are 75x75 > >guess which two have the larger filesize? > >if the 75x75 ones come first alphabetically, then they get used. (when >i first started with 6.x slimserver, this is what happened by default). > But WMP names one of these folder.jpg, which is 200x200, and is one that SBS will find and use before the other ones.
>clearly, using the "bigger" ones would be better. alphabetical, in any >likely scenario, is purely arbitrary, bigger filesize is more likely to >be optimal. do you disagree? > It's not clearly the case at all. Bigger filesize doesn't necessarily mean bigger resolution, and doesn't necessarily mean it is cover art. _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
