andyg;505069 Wrote: > Man I never would have guessed such an obvious change would result in > such an argument. File size doesn't make any more sense than > alphabetical, there is no good way to select a cover if you don't have > the correct filename. Alphabetical is as good as any other option.
andy, that isn't true. for example, WMP puts four files in with every rip, two are 200x200 while the other two are 75x75 guess which two have the larger filesize? if the 75x75 ones come first alphabetically, then they get used. (when i first started with 6.x slimserver, this is what happened by default). clearly, using the "bigger" ones would be better. alphabetical, in any likely scenario, is purely arbitrary, bigger filesize is more likely to be optimal. do you disagree? -- MrSinatra www.lion-radio.org using: sb2 & sbc (my home) / sbr (parent's home) - sbs 7.5b - win xp pro sp3 ie8 - p4(ht) 3.2ghz / 2gig ram - 1tb wd usb2 raid1 - d-link dir-655 - 35k mp3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ MrSinatra's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2336 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=71768 _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
