>not necessarily... looking for biggest filesize is no different than >looking for first alphabetical filename. i suspect thats also true of >resolution, as thats known to the OS as well, but i'm not positive on >that. > You are making assumptions about the OS. I don't think it can be assumed that every OS that this runs on can get the filesize or image resolution as easily as you think.
Other ways to select would be to find the image with the squarest image aspect ratio, or produce a montage image from all the images that it finds in the folder. What if the songs on an album come from different folders? >> And the file with the largest resolution isn't necessarily the right one >> anyway. eg. I have a few albums with the booklet pages scanned (i.e. >> front and back joined as one image), which would have a larger >> resolution than the cover art. > >for the very few who do anything like that, they can and already do >specify the filename, so no difference. > Exactly what I meant. I think additional logic would over complicate it unnecessarily. Ultimately, if the wrong image is automatically selected, the user can correct it. _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
