mherger wrote:
>
> I did run a quick test on my 4 years old MacBook Pro. I was able to
> compile the latest library without any major issue. That's good news.
> But I didn't see any significant (or even measurable!) difference in
> scanning my test library of about 6k tracks.
6k tracks is way little to make the database a bottleneck, I think you
need at least 30k tracks (probably more) for the database to be the
limiting factor.
In a small library I believe previous tests has shown that the main
bottleneck is always the disk I/O towards music files.
Also, I think it would be preferred to focus on optimizing browse speed
rather than scanning speed.
I would personally prefer to re-introduce MySQL as an option for people
with large libraries.
Erland Isaksson ('My homepage' (http://erland.isaksson.info))
(Developer of 'many plugins/applets (both free and commercial)'
(http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/User:Erland).
If you like to encourage future presence on this forum and/or third
party plugin/applet development, 'consider purchasing some plugins'
(http://license.isaksson.info))
*Interested in the future of music streaming ? 'ickStream - A world of
music at your fingertips'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?98467-Pre-Announcement-ickStream&p=743516)*.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
erland's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3124
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101248
_______________________________________________
beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
