erland wrote: > 6k tracks is way little to make the database a bottleneck, I think you > need at least 30k tracks (probably more) for the database to be the > limiting factor. > > In a small library I believe previous tests has shown that the main > bottleneck is always the disk I/O towards music files. > > Also, I think it would be preferred to focus on optimizing browse speed > rather than scanning speed. > > I would personally prefer to re-introduce MySQL as an option for people > with large libraries.
have we not seen that user with >100k tracks start to exprience problems , for example it takes a long time for new music to load etc ,but there soem old treads about this. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3 sub. Bedroom/Office: Boom Kitchen: Touch + powered Fostex PM0.4 Misc use: Radio (with battery) iPad1 with iPengHD & SqueezePad (in storage SB3, reciever ,controller ) server HP proliant micro server N36L with ClearOS Linux http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101248 _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
