On Feb 2, 6:33 pm, Derk Solko <[email protected]> wrote:
> Could we do better? Of course. One can always 'do better.'
>
> Risk versus reward, people. Keeping enough hardware and keeping said
> hardware updated and operational is an additional (and not
> insignificant) effort. Said effort could be placed into making sure
> the site is better/faster/whatever, or it could be spent trying to
> achieve high-availability fail-over situations, or we can just live
> with small outages from time to time. Which do you suppose we
> favor..?
Well it's obvious which one you favour, but see my question below.
> We have two full-time developers. Any further questions...?
Yes.
1. Are you aware that feature development and production/reliability
require two fairly disjoint sets of skills and interests that very
frequently don't co-occur in the same people?
2. What are you doing posting here when you could be making the site
come back faster by shouting at and/or kicking something? :)
B>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BGG
Down" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/BGG_down?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
