Still, even if bollards will not provide enough light (this is debatable) due to lack of ambient and other sources of light, then the current design continues to be defective and does not meet the DOT guidelines. The DOT guidelines recommend continuous lighting without gaps of darkness between light poles. The design proposed by the city spaces the light poles too far apart and the result will be alternating patterns of high light intensity with very little or no illumination. The poles need to be closer together.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:43 PM, George Perkins <[email protected]> wrote: >>> why the city hasn't considered a design that follows the DOT guidelines for lighting a bike and pedestrian path<<< _______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
