and I say it at a point where I am already passing them on their left side...to 
give less time to have them jump the wrong way...plus sending out good karma is 
something we could all do a little more often...and I agree with an early post 
today..its time to move onto some other topics.

How's this for one?....people cycling wearing headphones....its extremely 
dangerous to others...and to them...if your passing on the left and they 
swerve..they put YOU into traffic...no bueno...should it be illegal?
 


________________________________
 From: Kris Niemann <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Bikies] Courtesy or Nuisance?
 

Of course, if someone has the gall/stupidity to pass on the right, they 
shouldn't be allowed on the bike path, anyway. ;)





________________________________
 From: Patrick Lenon <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Bikies] Courtesy or Nuisance?
 

 
That sounds nice, but when you're coming up from behind someone it's good to 
let them know WHICH side you'll be passing on.  Not that everyone processes "On 
your left" uniformly, but it does give the pedestrian more info.

-------------
Patrick Lenon



________________________________
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 05:00:53 -0800
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Bikies] Courtesy or Nuisance?


same as Tom here..."Good Morning" is the same syllable count as "on your left" 
and much more pleasant...why not be? Its not like we're racing in the tour.


 
Troy Thiel


________________________________
 From: Tom Held <[email protected]>
To: Mark Shahan <[email protected]> 
Cc: bikies <[email protected]> 
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Bikies] Courtesy or Nuisance?
 

Great discussion and I thought Robbie had an excellent approach.  I would add 
this: I try to greet people first - good morning, good afternoon, Hi, how are 
you - to let them know I'm behind them. Then announce my intention to pass. It 
gives people time to react.

 Tom


On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Mark Shahan <[email protected]> wrote:

Bob,
>
>The problem is most people don't know that when they walk against traffic on 
>the left, they are suppose to move off the path when on-coming traffic 
>approaches.   The result is I have had some close calls when people, 
>especially dog walkers, won't move to the side of the path.  This most often 
>happens on my way to work when I turn left from the ramp onto the Pheasant 
>Branch Creek path to go under Parmenter St. in Middleton.  As I turn onto the 
>path under Parmenter St., sight distances are limited and reaction time is 
>further limited by the fact that people are moving toward you instead of away 
>from you.  Despite having to slow way down due to a sharp turn onto the path, 
>I have nearly hit a couple of dog walkers who would not step off of the path.
>
>At night on the SW Path, it can be difficult to tell if someone is coming 
>towards you or moving away from you.  The result is again decreased reaction 
>time once you determine they are moving towards you.
>
>And as John Rider has said on this list, what do you do when 2 bicyclists 
>moving in opposite directions each meet a pedestrian walking against traffic?  
>This situations happens on the SW Path resulting in a traffic jam as everybody 
>comes to a complete stop.
>
>Mark
>
>
>
>On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 5:23 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> 
>wrote:
>
> I apply the same rule as I use on any other
>>multi-
>>user intermodal paved transportation facility (i.e., STREET, ROAD, HIGHWAY)
>>that
>>lacks separate sidewalks.  I walk on the left, facing the direction of
>>traffic
>>for safety.  I know we go over this from time to time, and someone
>>inevitably
>>trots out the party line doctrine that you follow OPPOSITE pedestrian rules
>>when
>>the wheeled shared user is a bicycle rather than a motor vehicle.  I'm not
>>convinced by the nonsensical party line doctrine anyway, but the real test
>>(and,
>>indeed, the only one that matters) is that I feel much safer on foot if I
>>can
>>see what's approaching and can move to the side as needed.  And when a
>>bicyclist, I can also proceed with more certainty knowing that the other
>>person
>>sees me as well and can adjust my speed and shift my position as needed
>>just as
>>when I am approaching from behind a pedestrian.
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>>mail2web - Check your email from the web at
>>http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Bikies mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
>>
>
>
>-- 
>Mark N. Shahan                               ------  __o
>607 Piper Drive                          -------  _`\<,_
>Madison, WI 53711-1338             ---- (*)/ (*)
>(608) 274-9367
>[email protected]
>
>_______________________________________________
>Bikies mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
>
>

_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org



_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org



_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to