Messages by Thread
-
-
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step function
Raystonn
-
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 48, Issue 41
Raystonn
-
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 48, Issue 41
Damian Gomez
-
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 48, Issue 41
Damian Gomez
-
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 48, Issue 41
Damian Gomez
-
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 48, Issue 41
Damian Gomez
-
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 48, Issue 41
Gregory Maxwell
-
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 48, Issue 41
Peter Todd
-
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase (Raystonn)
Damian Gomez
-
[Bitcoin-development] Softfork signaling improvements
Douglas Roark
-
[Bitcoin-development] Removing transaction data from blocks
Arne Brutschy
-
[Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step function
Matt Whitlock
-
[Bitcoin-development] Suggestion: Dynamic block size that updates like difficulty
Michael Naber
-
[Bitcoin-development] Assurance contracts to fund the network with OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY
Tier Nolan
-
[Bitcoin-development] Solution for Block Size Increase
Nicolas DORIER
-
[Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase Requirements
Matt Corallo
-
[Bitcoin-development] Mechanics of a hard fork
Roy Badami
-
[Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase
Matt Corallo