I second this. It makes no sense to pay more than the retail price for bulk
prices ! I have already seen some people switching over to other registrars.
As much as OpenSRS may like us to believe that other price competitive
registrars are going bust, there is little evidence to suggest that. Even if
that would have been happening, Rest of the registrars would only be too
happy to service us with our existing domain name inventory.

Ashish

----- Original Message -----
From: Omar Chavez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Darrell Harder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: Domain for 9.95 ?


> Though it's been discussed to length previously, I think is time OpenSRS
> revises its pricing structure downward to accommodate market realities.
> If other registrars can manage charging the END USER $8.95 (with all the
> high costs associated in reaching those end users), there is no reason
> why OpenSRS can give us resellers a price closer to $8. Coming from
> Tucows -which has traditionally been known as an open source heaven, and
> provided the low cost of acquiring us resellers, there must be a way for
> them to better compete and dominate the market while helping us all.
>
> Last week we had a heated discussion in our company regarding the
> possible switch from OpenSRS to Godaddy.com, since they'd charge us much
> less than OSRS and their interface is as good as or superior... we
> stayed course mainly because we believe in long-term relationships, but
> I'm not sure next time around I'd be as willing to defend a good partner
> who is too blind and deaf to the market it serves.
>
>
> --
> Omar Chavez, MCSE
> Vicepresident of Technology
> ***************************************************************
> Knowledge Data Systems, Inc.
> 4744 SW 74th Avenue
> Miami, FL 33155 USA
> Tel  (305) 269-6962 - Fax (305) 269-6963
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.webkds.com
> ***************************************************************
> Internet Consulting, Development and Hosting

Reply via email to