Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote: > On Sun, Feb 11, at 11:33 Dan Nicholson wrote: >> On 2/11/07, Ag. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Sun, Feb 11, at 12:52 Randy McMurchy wrote: >>>> 8. I'm showing a significant difference in disk space used (The book >>>> shows 823MB, my logs show 157MB). Can anyone provide some additional >>>> info from their own logs? >>>> >>> Exactly 157. >> I'm seeing 183 including all the tarballs, log, build and installed files. >> >>> Speaking about disk space sizes,I noticed some differences with mines in >>> some >>> packages e.g lynx,so I thought I was doing something wrong. >>> Just to be sure,you don't count the tarball size into it,right? >> Some of the disk space sizes are certainly out of date, but I thought >> we did count the tarball sizes. Randy, Bruce? >> > > While we are at it,a second question. > Why we don't use du instead of df ? > du is much more flexible in that regard.
df is faster. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
