(Fixing top-posted material) > DJ Lucas wrote these words on 03/08/08 09:06 CST: >> Hi all, I wanted to see if there were any objections to commenting out >> the JDK source build for now.
Loren Foret wrote these words on 03/08/08 09:41 CST: > It's fine with me but I would like to see it stay since I do use it and it > is one of the more complex build jobs. It could prove beneficial to see it > stay. On the other hand, if there is an open alternitive then sure, I'll be > glad to see it go. There are alternatives to the JDK, but I've never even tried one of them ever. Also, please don't top-post, it is much easier to follow a thread if you put your reply under the relevant material you quote. > PS: this is my first post to this group. Just to share a little info about > me, I am a 3 year linux admin. Been using linux since Red Hat 6. My current > developer system is an LFS/BLFS build 6.3 running on Raid 0. If anyone is > interested, I have some special modifications to make LFS work well on Raid > 0 root. I am not a veteran coder by any means but I am sure I have a few > little tricks I can bring to the table. Cool. Looking forward to seeing some of these! -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.22] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 09:53:01 up 20 days, 1:38, 1 user, load average: 0.25, 0.28, 0.20 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
