On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1. Not a great big deal, but the fop shell script would have to > be modified quite a bit as it specifically looks for the JRE, > JAVA_HOME and other JDK type specifics.
The major distros use some wrapper scripts that provide a JDK like interface to gcj. I forgot the name of the package. > > 2. This is a major one. Using GCJ means that you have to rebuild > and replace your C compiler (unless you install it in an alternate > location, fudge the path a bit and perhaps some other mods to > accommodate using GCJ from one path but not the C compiler). Not > sure if we want to modify the GCC BLFS installation to accommodate > a more-or-less stand-alone GCJ installation. > BLFS installs gcc with java on top of the existing gcc. So there is no need for any hacks. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
