On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 04:13:46PM +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > I would say it be more accurate to use the lfssvn tag. Excerpt from > general.ent: In which case, those of us who have tested gcc5 before it was committed to LFS would not be able to tag until we make a fresh build using a published version of LFS. Even my most recent build, with the released 5.1.0, happened before that.
ĸen -- Nanny Ogg usually went to bed early. After all, she was an old lady. Sometimes she went to bed as early as 6 a.m. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
