Le 26/04/2015 16:41, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : > On 26-04-2015 11:13, Pierre Labastie wrote: >> Le 26/04/2015 00:24, Douglas R. Reno a écrit : >>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Ken Moffat <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I'd better begin by checking that nobody objects if I tag things >>>> which I built with 5.1.0-RC-20150412 (-rc1) ? >>>> >>>> [...] So, please don't expect my tagging to be quick ;-) >>>> >>>> ĸen >>> >>> Hi Ken, >>> >>> I am working on an LFS SVN 20150424 system right now with GCC5, so I >>> will tag things as I go through my BLFS install as well. I am building >>> with GCC-5.1.0 right now. >>> >>> Douglas R. Reno >>> >> >> I would say it be more accurate to use the lfssvn tag. Excerpt from >> general.ent: >> --------------- >> <!-- usage: <para>&lfssvn_checked;ccyymmdd&lfssvn_checked2;</para> --> >> <!ENTITY lfssvn_checked "This package is known to build and work (no >> line break here) properly >> using an LFS-SVN-"> >> <!ENTITY lfssvn_checked2 " platform."> >> <!ENTITY lfssvn_built "This package is known to build using an (no >> line break here) LFS-SVN-"> >> <!ENTITY lfssvn_built2 " platform but has not been tested."> >> ---------------- >> >> And LFS SVN 20150424 implies gcc 5, so the gcc5 tag would be unneeded, >> although it would do no harm, of course. > > Your next sentence shows that gcc 5 is needed.
Sorry, I just meant no need for &gcc5 _if you use_ &lfssvn. > >> I plan to update to gcc 5 directly on blfs, starting from an lfs 7.7 base. >> So, >> anything built afterwards, I'll tag gcc5. >> >> Hope it is ok too > > It's OK. > > I did DESTDIR build gcc-5.1.0 yesterday, and after finishing the > gnutls/nettle/pk11 trio, will install it, so, my plan is the same as yours. > > BTW, I have run the tests (-j1), and can post the log or the summary, so > we could compare. Would it be useful for you? It would be useful for me, > just to be sure that my build is OK. Thanks Fernando, I plan to first update jave, which, as you know, takes a long time, because you have to build two JAVAVM (32 and 64 bit), and tests take 126 SBU... I'll let you know when I have tests available. Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
