On 26-04-2015 13:51, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 04:13:46PM +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote: >> >> I would say it be more accurate to use the lfssvn tag. Excerpt from >> general.ent: > In which case, those of us who have tested gcc5 before it was > committed to LFS would not be able to tag until we make a fresh > build using a published version of LFS. Even my most recent > build, with the released 5.1.0, happened before that.
ĸen, As I've written in the other post, it is even better, having different 7.7 and SVN ages. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
