Le 26/04/2015 19:31, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : > On 26-04-2015 13:51, Ken Moffat wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 04:13:46PM +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote: >>> >>> I would say it be more accurate to use the lfssvn tag. Excerpt from >>> general.ent: >> In which case, those of us who have tested gcc5 before it was >> committed to LFS would not be able to tag until we make a fresh >> build using a published version of LFS. Even my most recent >> build, with the released 5.1.0, happened before that. > > ĸen, > > As I've written in the other post, it is even better, having different > 7.7 and SVN ages. >
After reading all posts, I agree. Thanks to all for the discussion. Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
