On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:02:01AM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > On 23/02/2018 07:48, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > Ken Moffat wrote: > >> [...] > > >[...] > > In any case, I'm OK with dropping qtwebkit, I can also live with dropping > > qtwebengine and qupzilla. We have five other graphical browsers and three > > text browsers. > > > > We shouldn't drop qupzilla, unless we drop LXQt too. But I like them both. > The silly thing is that if you want chromium and qupzilla, you build the > chromium/blink engine twice (one for qtwebengine, and one for chromium > itself). > > At least for midori and epiphany, you build webkitgtk only once. Now I am not > sure the WebKit engine is the best one compared to gecko/mozilla and chromium. > > Note that KDE has integrated qupzilla into their projects, under the name > falkon. Plasma integration of falkon is one of the projects for google summer > of code. > > Pierre
I didn't know about falkon. I now see that the github repo says - "QupZilla was renamed to Falkon and moved to KDE infrastructure New repository is now available at https://phabricator.kde.org/source/falkon/. This repository at GitHub will only be used for 2.2 release and after that will be made read-only." I hope that won't mean I have to build a lot of kf5 for future releases. ĸen -- Truth, in front of her huge walk-in wardrobe, selected black leather boots with stiletto heels for such a barefaced truth. - Unseen Academicals -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
