On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 05:28:38PM -0500, renodr via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 2018-10-25 16:29, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> >
> > For elfhack, all I can find is a comment that that builds failed in
> > fedora 29, no details at all. Also, for 63, and probably for 62
> > befoe that, they use a patch to disable it. Not understood.
> >
> > Holding fire on this part until (perhaps) Douglas can clarify what
> > might be different in his system.
> >
>
> I can't clarify what is different in my system. I used jhalfs to build it
> with LFS 8.3 as a base, with the standard libelf in LFS. This is with
> systemd, although I don't think it matters. I'm running kernel version 4.19
> on this system.
>
> I'm not 100% certain what is going on here. Wait for Bruce's results without
> it to see what he says... this is all confusing...
>
OK. I'll maybe try a build with elfhack disabled tomorrow on my
haswell, to confirm space measurements and to see if the startup time
appears to be impacted.
Meanwhile, trying clang-5.0 on an 8.2 system (I know I said "don't",
but things need to be confirmed - and gentoo appear to require
llvm >= 4.0)..
ĸen
--
Is it about a bicycle ?
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
