Re: [blfs-dev] Is the i686 patch needed for Qtwebengine-5.12.1?

[Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev]

Hello,

On 02/08/2019 03:50 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:

On 02/08/2019 02:37 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:

On 08/02/2019 19:48, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:

On 2/8/19 3:22 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:

Hi,

Trying to build qtwebengine-5.12.1 (for x86_64), I applied the patch
(done
automatically by jhalfs), and the build failed quickly. Looking at
the source,
it seems to me that the proper macro is now defined if gcc is
used... So I
wonder whether the patch is still needed. Maybe, Douglas can confirm
it is
not. Otherwise, I'll update my 32 bit VM and try (may take some time).

Regards,
Pierre

Hi Pierre,

I'll go confirm that it's still needed. If it is, I'll add a case
statement
(which I should've done in the first place, sorry about that!) so
that jhalfs
doesn't apply it on the wrong architecture.

It'll take me about half a day though, since a few updates have to be
done on
that machine. I'll get back to you by the end of the day hopefully.

Thanks (I guess I'll be asleep by the end or your day ;)

I'm building a 32 bit VM with latest LFS, and I get quite a few
failures in
tests: fortunately, important tests (glibc, gcc, gmp, mpfr, mpc) do
not have
to many failures, but there are ~140 FAIL in autoconf, one fail in perl,
several in bash, etc.

Anyway, I'll keep going, and try to reach qtwebengine overnight
(9:30pm here)

autoconf failures are caused by bash-5.  It has been reported upstream.

Not sure about what is the list consensus about compiling qtwebengine
So, my 2 cents.

On my side (x86_64, no patch applied)
qtwebengine-5.12.0 is compiling A_ONE
Then, --> everything else equals <--
qtwebengine-5.12.1  is NOT compiling
failing big trouble is very deep within the compilation sequence:


 void DevToolsDataSource::StartRemoteDataRequest(
      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.

Could someone confirm this finding?

I do not understand how the autoconf fact could be related
to qtwebengin. Meanwhile
autoconf-2.69
bash-5.0
where used in both compilation.

--
seen "Linux from scratch" and looking for ISO files
www.osukiss.org

r/include/nss -isystem../../../../../../../../../usr/include/nspr -isystem ../../../../src/3rdparty/chromium/third_party/abseil-cpp -std=gnu++14 -Wno-narrowing -Wno-attributes -Wno-class-memaccess -Wno-subobject-linkage -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -c ../../../../src/3rdparty/chromium/chrome/browser/ui/webui/devtools_ui.cc -o obj/qtwebengine_sources/devtools_ui.o ../../../../src/3rdparty/chromium/chrome/browser/ui/webui/devtools_ui.cc:257:6: warning: ‘void {anonymous}::DevToolsDataSource::StartRemoteDataRequest(const GURL&, const GotDataCallback&)’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page