On 09/02/2019 02:34, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Not sure about what is the list consensus about compiling qtwebengine
> So, my 2 cents.
>
> On my side (x86_64, no patch applied)
> qtwebengine-5.12.0 is compiling A_ONE
> Then, --> everything else equals <--
> qtwebengine-5.12.1 is NOT compiling
> failing big trouble is very deep within the compilation sequence:
>
> r/include/nss -isystem../../../../../../../../../usr/include/nspr -isystem
> ../../../../src/3rdparty/chromium/third_party/abseil-cpp -std=gnu++14
> -Wno-narrowing -Wno-attributes -Wno-class-memaccess -Wno-subobject-linkage
> -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -c
> ../../../../src/3rdparty/chromium/chrome/browser/ui/webui/devtools_ui.cc -o
> obj/qtwebengine_sources/devtools_ui.o
> ../../../../src/3rdparty/chromium/chrome/browser/ui/webui/devtools_ui.cc:257:6:
> warning:
This is a warning, not what generates the "subcommand failed" below.
> ‘void {anonymous}::DevToolsDataSource::StartRemoteDataRequest(const GURL&,
> const GotDataCallback&)’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> void DevToolsDataSource::StartRemoteDataRequest(
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
Look for "error:" earlier in the log.
>
> Could someone confirm this finding?
I've compiled qtwebengine-5.12.1 (on a 64 bit VM) successfully once the patch
has been removed...
>
> I do not understand how the autoconf fact could be related
> to qtwebengin.
Yeah sorry. I had to build a 32 bt VM, and I made a comment about some
findings while doing that, but it's not related to the subject of this thread.
> Meanwhile
> autoconf-2.69
> bash-5.0
> where used in both compilation.
>
>
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
