On 08/02/2019 21:37, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: > On 08/02/2019 19:48, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote: >> >> On 2/8/19 3:22 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Trying to build qtwebengine-5.12.1 (for x86_64), I applied the patch (done >>> automatically by jhalfs), and the build failed quickly. Looking at the >>> source, >>> it seems to me that the proper macro is now defined if gcc is used... So I >>> wonder whether the patch is still needed. Maybe, Douglas can confirm it is >>> not. Otherwise, I'll update my 32 bit VM and try (may take some time). >>> >>> Regards, >>> Pierre >> >> Hi Pierre, >> >> I'll go confirm that it's still needed. If it is, I'll add a case statement >> (which I should've done in the first place, sorry about that!) so that jhalfs >> doesn't apply it on the wrong architecture. >> >> It'll take me about half a day though, since a few updates have to be done on >> that machine. I'll get back to you by the end of the day hopefully. >> > > Thanks (I guess I'll be asleep by the end or your day ;) > > I'm building a 32 bit VM with latest LFS, and I get quite a few failures in > tests: fortunately, important tests (glibc, gcc, gmp, mpfr, mpc) do not have > to many failures, but there are ~140 FAIL in autoconf, one fail in perl, > several in bash, etc. > > Anyway, I'll keep going, and try to reach qtwebengine overnight (9:30pm here) >
As a matter of fact, archlinux has no patch anymore. Currently building qtwebengine on a 32 bit VM. Seems to build. Douglas, I searched the mailing lists, but cannot find what the symptom was. Build failure, or runtime? Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
