On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:49:37PM +0200, dueffert--- via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote:
>
>
> > My guess the downloaded lxml
> > lxml-4.1.1.tgz
> > is not set/ready to work with libxml2?
> >
> > If you have an lxml already installed (libxml2
> > compatible), this could explain our building difference...
> That's it. I haven't, but it does explain the difference nevertheless. My
> libreoffice does not attempt to download/install lxml:
>
> checking for python lxml... no, and system does not provide python
> development headers, gla11y will only report widget classes and ids
>
> This is likely due to me having added --enable-python=no to libreoffice in
> the past, surely due to some build problem at that time that may have been
> python2 or python3 specific. This is a deviation from the book. Haven't
> missed any functionality because of that so far...
>
Cool, in the interests of reducing what I install I'll have to try
that at some point in the future (it would definitely have avoided
the "execute user python code" vulnerabilities).
On all my builds of 6.3.0.4 I've had lxml installed (4.3.0, 4.3.1,
4.4)
Looking at the log from one of the LO builds, it does check for
lxml, I guess I'd better add that to the recommended packages.
ĸen
--
Adopted by dwarfs, brought up by dwarfs. To dwarfs I'm a dwarf, sir.
I can do the rite of k'zakra, I know the secrets of h'ragna, I can
ha'lk my g'rakha correctly ... I am a dwarf
Captain Carrot Ironfoundersson (in The Fifth Elephant)
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
