James Fowler wrote:
Yes, "wait and see" sounds good. I prefer the current approach (not putting leading spaces in "elements"), it just seems cleaner. With the mod to switch spaces to in place, that seems to take care of the problem for me. Unless something else comes up that makes it break, I think we've got it resolved.
Agreed!
Not yet. I'm trying to maintain the illusion that I can justify all this time related to short term needs for documentation I'm writing ;). I've got to draw the line somewhere... I might end up needing this for my current project docs, but I'm hoping someone else will have checked this out by then.
:-) I understand perfectly what you mean.
''' Why program by hand in five days what you can spend five years of your life automating? '''
Well, I think we're very close. I'll see if I can find some time to do some QBk coding. I'd also want to push the Lit-programming facility. It'll save me lots of time in the end.
Personally, I would prefer subversion instead of CVS, but either system (CVS or subversion) would be an improvement over tossing zip files around :) I might be able to get this up on a publicly accessible subversion server. I'd rather have someone else deal with this, but unless there is a strong consensus on sticking with CVS I'd be willing to try if that gets this into subversion.
Hey, that would be awesome. Anyway, if you can't find the time, you are always welcome to use the Spirit CVS.
Cheers, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
