James Fowler wrote:
James Fowler wrote:

Incidentally, I've tweaked my proposal -- sorted out a few typos, added a little more detail.
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/thomas.guest/qbk_proposal/

I'll have to check that out (probably not tonight though, dinner guests will be here soon...)

Took a quick peek anyhow, and realized that's the page I got your source from in the first place (thanks!). A quick skim through reminded me of a few more things :


    * The fix for newlines (which might have been something I broke in
      the first place ;) ) takes care of the " " -> " " translation
    * I did some comparisons with the "original"
      pre-dynamic-highlighting output, and the whitespace was kept
      inside the phrases with other adjacent stuff - which seemed to
      "work" but looked a bit weird - IMHO it's cleaner now

Nice to hear. I don't quite recall now why I ended up adding   The only thing I remember is that in some cases, a " " is ignored by XML.

    * I have not integrated any of the new docs you wrote for the
      dynamic highlighting stuff
    * the dynamic highlighting is working great for my docs - kudos to
      Mr Guest :)

Kudos to you too!

Regards,
--
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs

Reply via email to