James Fowler <boost_list <at> openseaconsulting.com> writes:

> 
> Joel de Guzman wrote:
[snip]

> > Well, I think we're very close. I'll see if I can find some
> > time to do some QBk coding. I'd also want to push the
> > Lit-programming facility. It'll save me lots of time in
> > the end.
> 
> I dare not contemplate the possibilities of a Boost-centric literate 
> programming initiative!

[snip]

This interests me too. I'd be interested to see some of the Litre source for the
Template Metaprogramming book. I don't think I can get at it since I'm not a
reviewer.

The current quickbook.qbk is manually kept in step with the quickbook.hpp
grammar, but with semantic actions stripped. We should take it as a sign that
things are working properly when this is sorted!

James -- I've tweaked the files "quickbook.hlt", "syntax_highlight.[ch]pp" so
that the source-mode identifier is itself a pattern which should match file
extensions for included source. E.g.

"[Cc]\+\+|[ch]pp|[ch]xx|cc|ipp" { "preprocessor" = ... }
"[Pp]ython" { "comment" = ... }

I've updated these files in the zip archive available on my website:

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/thomas.guest/qbk_proposal/

but not changed the docs. Do you think this works better with the way files are
included? 

Thomas



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs

Reply via email to