João Abecasis wrote:
Eric Niebler wrote:
Is this better?
http://tinyurl.com/j4y4s
<snip>
All in all, I prefer the second 'after' in your last link above. I think
it solves all issues simply and nicely!
Good. Now all I need to do is figure out what the XSL incantation is
that generates it. :-P
Also what is the rationale for singling
out std::basic_string (and Char const *) instead of going for the more
general Range concept?
Very off-topic here, but I'm just following the TR1 regex spec. Besides,
in the future, Range won't cover Char const *. A Range-based interface
might make for a nice extension to TR1, though.
--
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
