Re: EBBR Testing topic for today?

Grant Likely Thu, 20 May 2021 07:56:02 -0700

Thanks Masami,

Comments below...


On 20/05/2021 11:09, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:

Hi Grant,

I have a comment on the U-Boot configuration:
https://github.com/ARM-software/ebbr/wiki/U-Boot-Configuration-Guide

The U-Boot Sniff Test requires bootefi hello and selftest,
---
u-boot=> bootefi hello ${fdtcontroladdr}
u-boot=> bootefi selftest ${fdtcontroladdr}
---

So, U-Boot needs to enable below options too.

CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_HELLO_COMPILE=y
CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_HELLO=y
CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_SELFTEST=y

While these commands are useful, they should not be required to be builtin. I've added those options to the bottom of the configuration guideand moved the test commands out of the sniff test and into theconfiguration guide for those who want to run those tests.

And I have a question about SCT's EBBR result (according to the
EBBR-Testing-Guide). Recently my team ran the SCT on our board and got
some failures.
One of them was related to the Auth variable,

/opt/sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/RuntimeServices/VariableServices/BlackBoxTest/AuthVariableServicesBBTestFunction.c
635 Status - Invalid Parameter
RT.SetVariable - Create one Time Base Auth Variable, the expect return
status should be EFI_SUCCESS
FAILURE

But I think U-Boot Auth Variable is not enabled unless UEFI secure
boot is enabled. So other test cases are waived. But this specific
test case failed.

guid: 008E18A5-C345-48AE-9134-61A692E30B87
set guid: 9338D0EC-807B-4750-986A-8F2A91BB3616

Easy answer here is to enable secure boot in U-Boot to get rid of thesefailures. I've added that option to the wiki


CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT=y

Vincent, this is something to discuss. Secure Boot is supported, but notrequired by SystemReady IR. Should we ignore failures when secure bootis disabled in the parsing script?

g.


Thank you,

2021年5月12日(水) 19:46 Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hirama...@linaro.org>:


Hi Grant,

Thanks, this is what I need. I'll check them out!

2021年5月12日(水) 18:56 Grant Likely <grant.lik...@arm.com>:


Hi Masami,

Here are the instructions that I've been working on:

https://github.com/ARM-software/ebbr/wiki/EBBR-Testing-Guide
https://github.com/ARM-software/ebbr/wiki/U-Boot-Configuration-Guide

I hope that helps

g.

On 12/05/2021 02:02, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:

Hello Grant and Vincent,

I'm interested in passing SCT on my board with the latest U-Boot.
Would you know which CONFIG options are required for the SCT?
I guess some CONFIG_EFI* options are related, but some of them may not
be needed.
Is there any good documentation about configuring U-Boot?

Thank you,

2021年5月10日(月) 22:36 Grant Likely <grant.lik...@arm.com>:


For the EBBR meeting today:

Attached is the test result report from running a recent version of
U-Boot on an iMX8 platform and parsed with the SCT_Parser tool.

g.


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:        Re: EBBR Testing topic for today?
Date:   Mon, 10 May 2021 14:22:56 +0100
From:   Vincent Stehle <vincent.ste...@arm.com>
To:     Grant Likely <grant.lik...@arm.com>



Hi Grant,

Here are some more SCT results: a run from this morning on Compulab,
with latest firmware from Paul (+ 3 patches) and latest sct parser config.

INFO main: 0 dropped(s), 0 failure(s), 66 ignored(s), 10753 pass(s), 60
waived(s), 0 warning(s)

(The attached summary excludes the pass.)

Best regards,
Vincent.




_______________________________________________
boot-architecture mailing list
boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture



--
Masami Hiramatsu




--
Masami Hiramatsu


_______________________________________________
boot-architecture mailing list
boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture

Re: EBBR Testing topic for today?

Reply via email to