Hi, 2021年5月20日(木) 23:55 Grant Likely <grant.lik...@arm.com>: > > Thanks Masami, > > Comments below... > > On 20/05/2021 11:09, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > Hi Grant, > > > > I have a comment on the U-Boot configuration: > > https://github.com/ARM-software/ebbr/wiki/U-Boot-Configuration-Guide > > > > The U-Boot Sniff Test requires bootefi hello and selftest, > > --- > > u-boot=> bootefi hello ${fdtcontroladdr} > > u-boot=> bootefi selftest ${fdtcontroladdr} > > --- > > > > So, U-Boot needs to enable below options too. > > > > CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_HELLO_COMPILE=y > > CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_HELLO=y > > CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_SELFTEST=y > > While these commands are useful, they should not be required to be built > in. I've added those options to the bottom of the configuration guide > and moved the test commands out of the sniff test and into the > configuration guide for those who want to run those tests.
Thanks for the update! > > > And I have a question about SCT's EBBR result (according to the > > EBBR-Testing-Guide). Recently my team ran the SCT on our board and got > > some failures. > > One of them was related to the Auth variable, > > > > /opt/sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/RuntimeServices/VariableServices/BlackBoxTest/AuthVariableServicesBBTestFunction.c > > 635 Status - Invalid Parameter > > RT.SetVariable - Create one Time Base Auth Variable, the expect return > > status should be EFI_SUCCESS > > FAILURE > > > > But I think U-Boot Auth Variable is not enabled unless UEFI secure > > boot is enabled. So other test cases are waived. But this specific > > test case failed. > > > > guid: 008E18A5-C345-48AE-9134-61A692E30B87 > > set guid: 9338D0EC-807B-4750-986A-8F2A91BB3616 > > Easy answer here is to enable secure boot in U-Boot to get rid of these > failures. I've added that option to the wiki > > CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT=y Hmm, but there are some other Auth Variable tests are correctly waived on the result. So I think it should be waived too. And as you said below, since SystemReady IR doesn't require the secure boot, I think the secure boot should not be enabled for EBBR test. > Vincent, this is something to discuss. Secure Boot is supported, but not > required by SystemReady IR. Should we ignore failures when secure boot > is disabled in the parsing script? Thank you, > > g. > > > > > Thank you, > > > > 2021年5月12日(水) 19:46 Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hirama...@linaro.org>: > > > >> > >> Hi Grant, > >> > >> Thanks, this is what I need. I'll check them out! > >> > >> 2021年5月12日(水) 18:56 Grant Likely <grant.lik...@arm.com>: > >>> > >>> Hi Masami, > >>> > >>> Here are the instructions that I've been working on: > >>> > >>> https://github.com/ARM-software/ebbr/wiki/EBBR-Testing-Guide > >>> https://github.com/ARM-software/ebbr/wiki/U-Boot-Configuration-Guide > >>> > >>> I hope that helps > >>> > >>> g. > >>> > >>> On 12/05/2021 02:02, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > >>>> Hello Grant and Vincent, > >>>> > >>>> I'm interested in passing SCT on my board with the latest U-Boot. > >>>> Would you know which CONFIG options are required for the SCT? > >>>> I guess some CONFIG_EFI* options are related, but some of them may not > >>>> be needed. > >>>> Is there any good documentation about configuring U-Boot? > >>>> > >>>> Thank you, > >>>> > >>>> 2021年5月10日(月) 22:36 Grant Likely <grant.lik...@arm.com>: > >>>>> > >>>>> For the EBBR meeting today: > >>>>> > >>>>> Attached is the test result report from running a recent version of > >>>>> U-Boot on an iMX8 platform and parsed with the SCT_Parser tool. > >>>>> > >>>>> g. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -------- Forwarded Message -------- > >>>>> Subject: Re: EBBR Testing topic for today? > >>>>> Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 14:22:56 +0100 > >>>>> From: Vincent Stehle <vincent.ste...@arm.com> > >>>>> To: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@arm.com> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Grant, > >>>>> > >>>>> Here are some more SCT results: a run from this morning on Compulab, > >>>>> with latest firmware from Paul (+ 3 patches) and latest sct parser > >>>>> config. > >>>>> > >>>>> INFO main: 0 dropped(s), 0 failure(s), 66 ignored(s), 10753 pass(s), 60 > >>>>> waived(s), 0 warning(s) > >>>>> > >>>>> (The attached summary excludes the pass.) > >>>>> > >>>>> Best regards, > >>>>> Vincent. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> boot-architecture mailing list > >>>>> boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org > >>>>> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Masami Hiramatsu > > > > > > > > -- > > Masami Hiramatsu > > > -- Masami Hiramatsu _______________________________________________ boot-architecture mailing list boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
