On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 09:00:11AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2021年5月20日(木) 23:55 Grant Likely <grant.lik...@arm.com>:
> >
> > Thanks Masami,
> >
> > Comments below...
> >
> > On 20/05/2021 11:09, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > Hi Grant,
> > >
> > > I have a comment on the U-Boot configuration:
> > > https://github.com/ARM-software/ebbr/wiki/U-Boot-Configuration-Guide
Another comment:
Please don't use "efidebug capsule update" command.
The only way that the current implementation of capsule update
with a capsule file supports (or CONFIG_EFI_CAPSULE_ON_DISK)
is "to reboot the system".
-Takahiro Akashi
> > > The U-Boot Sniff Test requires bootefi hello and selftest,
> > > ---
> > > u-boot=> bootefi hello ${fdtcontroladdr}
> > > u-boot=> bootefi selftest ${fdtcontroladdr}
> > > ---
> > >
> > > So, U-Boot needs to enable below options too.
> > >
> > > CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_HELLO_COMPILE=y
> > > CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_HELLO=y
> > > CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI_SELFTEST=y
> >
> > While these commands are useful, they should not be required to be built
> > in. I've added those options to the bottom of the configuration guide
> > and moved the test commands out of the sniff test and into the
> > configuration guide for those who want to run those tests.
>
> Thanks for the update!
>
>
> >
> > > And I have a question about SCT's EBBR result (according to the
> > > EBBR-Testing-Guide). Recently my team ran the SCT on our board and got
> > > some failures.
> > > One of them was related to the Auth variable,
> > >
> > > /opt/sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/RuntimeServices/VariableServices/BlackBoxTest/AuthVariableServicesBBTestFunction.c
> > > 635 Status - Invalid Parameter
> > > RT.SetVariable - Create one Time Base Auth Variable, the expect return
> > > status should be EFI_SUCCESS
> > > FAILURE
> > >
> > > But I think U-Boot Auth Variable is not enabled unless UEFI secure
> > > boot is enabled. So other test cases are waived. But this specific
> > > test case failed.
> > >
> > > guid: 008E18A5-C345-48AE-9134-61A692E30B87
> > > set guid: 9338D0EC-807B-4750-986A-8F2A91BB3616
> >
> > Easy answer here is to enable secure boot in U-Boot to get rid of these
> > failures. I've added that option to the wiki
> >
> > CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT=y
>
> Hmm, but there are some other Auth Variable tests are correctly waived
> on the result.
> So I think it should be waived too.
> And as you said below, since SystemReady IR doesn't require the secure
> boot, I think the secure boot should not be enabled for EBBR test.
>
> > Vincent, this is something to discuss. Secure Boot is supported, but not
> > required by SystemReady IR. Should we ignore failures when secure boot
> > is disabled in the parsing script?
>
> Thank you,
>
> >
> > g.
> >
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > 2021年5月12日(水) 19:46 Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hirama...@linaro.org>:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Hi Grant,
> > >>
> > >> Thanks, this is what I need. I'll check them out!
> > >>
> > >> 2021年5月12日(水) 18:56 Grant Likely <grant.lik...@arm.com>:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi Masami,
> > >>>
> > >>> Here are the instructions that I've been working on:
> > >>>
> > >>> https://github.com/ARM-software/ebbr/wiki/EBBR-Testing-Guide
> > >>> https://github.com/ARM-software/ebbr/wiki/U-Boot-Configuration-Guide
> > >>>
> > >>> I hope that helps
> > >>>
> > >>> g.
> > >>>
> > >>> On 12/05/2021 02:02, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > >>>> Hello Grant and Vincent,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I'm interested in passing SCT on my board with the latest U-Boot.
> > >>>> Would you know which CONFIG options are required for the SCT?
> > >>>> I guess some CONFIG_EFI* options are related, but some of them may not
> > >>>> be needed.
> > >>>> Is there any good documentation about configuring U-Boot?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thank you,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 2021年5月10日(月) 22:36 Grant Likely <grant.lik...@arm.com>:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> For the EBBR meeting today:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Attached is the test result report from running a recent version of
> > >>>>> U-Boot on an iMX8 platform and parsed with the SCT_Parser tool.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> g.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > >>>>> Subject: Re: EBBR Testing topic for today?
> > >>>>> Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 14:22:56 +0100
> > >>>>> From: Vincent Stehle <vincent.ste...@arm.com>
> > >>>>> To: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@arm.com>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Hi Grant,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Here are some more SCT results: a run from this morning on Compulab,
> > >>>>> with latest firmware from Paul (+ 3 patches) and latest sct parser
> > >>>>> config.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> INFO main: 0 dropped(s), 0 failure(s), 66 ignored(s), 10753 pass(s),
> > >>>>> 60
> > >>>>> waived(s), 0 warning(s)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> (The attached summary excludes the pass.)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>> Vincent.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>> boot-architecture mailing list
> > >>>>> boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org
> > >>>>> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Masami Hiramatsu
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Masami Hiramatsu
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Masami Hiramatsu
> _______________________________________________
> boot-architecture mailing list
> boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org
> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
_______________________________________________
boot-architecture mailing list
boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
