In a message dated 10/27/00 6:36:27 PM Mountain Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > There are a lot more than eight, too; according to CNN's count as of > today, the too-close-to-call states are AR,FL,IA,MI,MN,MO,NH,NM,OR,PA, > TN,WA,WI, and WV, accounting for 154 electoral votes. > > And the Republicans plan to start running pro-Nader ads on Monday in > OR,WA,and WI, according to an AP article this afternoon. You're deluding > yourself if you think it doesn't make a difference in those cases. Again, I said *unless* you are in a battleground state, a vote for Nader will not affect the outcome. I *know* it can affect the outcome, and even addressed that in my original post. Perhaps you should go back and re-read my post completely. Michael Harney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Winner Take All Re: discre... John D. Giorgis
- Re: Winner Take All Re: discre... J. van Baardwijk
- Re: Winner Take All Re: discre... Kristin A. Ruhle
- The Rest of the World Re: Winne... John D. Giorgis
- Re: The Rest of the World Re: W... J. van Baardwijk
- Re: Winner Take All Re: discre... Gord Sellar
- Re: Winner Take All Re: discre... John D. Giorgis
- Re: Winner Take All Re: discre... David Hobby
- Sheep in the Middle Re: Winner ... John D. Giorgis
- Re: discrepancy between Presidential polls Dan Minette
- Re: discrepancy between Presidential polls TursiopsAmicus
- Re: discrepancy between Presidential polls Andrea Leistra
- Re: discrepancy between Presidential polls TursiopsAmicus
- Re: discrepancy between Presidential polls TursiopsAmicus
- Re: discrepancy between Presidential polls John D. Giorgis
- Re: discrepancy between Presidential polls Dan Minette
- Re: discrepancy between Presidential polls Gord Sellar
- Re: discrepancy between Presidential polls TursiopsAmicus
- Re: discrepancy between Presidential polls Erik Reuter
- Re: discrepancy between Presidential polls John D. Giorgis
- Re: discrepancy between Presidential polls TursiopsAmicus
