At 12:05 PM 2/13/01 +0000, tim betz wrote:
>Well....i have a quick question here
>
>How do you define a "low value Job" ?
One that society retains the worker a low amount of compensation for
performing. Simple principle: a job you value more, you will pay more for
its completion.
>I'd have thought that when looking at a community as a whole...there is no
>such thing. All jobs are of value.
Of course. Saying that a job is "low value" inherently implies that its
value is > 0.
JDG
__________________________________________________________
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ICQ #3527685
"The point of living in a Republic after all, is that we do not live by
majority rule. We live by laws and a variety of isntitutions designed
to check each other." -Andrew Sullivan 01/29/01
- Re: Farming Re: Villain of the Week: Bolder Tec... K. Feete
- Re: Farming Re: Villain of the Week: Bolde... Andrea Leistra
- Re: Farming Re: Villain of the Week: Bolde... John D. Giorgis
- Re: Farming Re: Villain of the Week: B... Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- Bad Politicians Re: Farming Re: Vi... John D. Giorgis
- RE: Farming Re: Villain of the Week: Bolde... tim.betz
- Value of a Job RE: Farming Re: Villain... John D. Giorgis
- Value of a Job RE: Farming Re: Villain... John D. Giorgis
- RE: Farming Re: Villain of the Week: Bolde... Joshua Bell
- RE: Farming Re: Villain of the Week: B... Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Farming Re: Villain of the Week: Bolde... Joshua Bell
- Re: Farming Re: Villain of the Week: B... William T Goodall
- Re: Farming Re: Villain of the Wee... William T Goodall
- Re: Farming Re: Villain of the... dendriite
- Re: Farming Re: Villain o... Kevin Tarr
- Re: Farming Re: Villa... Brian Giles
- Re: Farming Re: V... J. van Baardwijk
