On Thursday, July 19, 2001 at 02:58:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 18 Jul 2001, at 21:37, John D. Giorgis wrote:
>
> > At 06:39 PM 7/18/01 +0100 Andrew Crystall wrote:
> > >pfffffffffft. About $300 per car, MAXIMUM, and about the same
> > >performance impact as switching from leaded to unleaded.
> > >Remembering you can ditch a lot of the current measures like cat
> > >converters because they're *not needed* with a fuel cell.
> >
> > You have a cite for that? If you mean to tell me that two cars of
> > comparable size and performance can be separated by only $300 and
> > tremendously lower emissions, I will have to read it to believe it.
> >
> > You wouldn't *NEED* a government regulation to sell this kind of car.
>
> Sure you would. Any idea how much switching designs would cost
> the Car industry. And the oil industry has vested interests as well.
> That's for mass production, BTW...limited production would cost
> much more.
>
> > >Look, I'm willing to argue a point, but not when you go off in
> > >capitalist ranting.
> >
---------------------
Wow. WOW! First you say it only cost $300 per car then it's a cost for this a cost for
that, I only meant mass production...I think someone has been looking at too many
sunrises.
Kevin Tarr
Trump high, lead low
