On 18 Jul 2001, at 22:31, camplate wrote:
Date sent: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 22:31:13 -0400 (EDT)
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "camplate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Authority of the marketplace?
> On Thursday, July 19, 2001 at 02:58:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On 18 Jul 2001, at 21:37, John D. Giorgis wrote:
> >
> > > At 06:39 PM 7/18/01 +0100 Andrew Crystall wrote:
> > > >pfffffffffft. About $300 per car, MAXIMUM, and about the same
> > > >performance impact as switching from leaded to unleaded.
> > > >Remembering you can ditch a lot of the current measures like cat
> > > >converters because they're *not needed* with a fuel cell.
> > >
> > > You have a cite for that? If you mean to tell me that two cars
> > > of comparable size and performance can be separated by only $300
> > > and tremendously lower emissions, I will have to read it to
> > > believe it.
> > >
> > > You wouldn't *NEED* a government regulation to sell this kind of
> > > car.
> >
> > Sure you would. Any idea how much switching designs would cost the
> > Car industry. And the oil industry has vested interests as well.
> > That's for mass production, BTW...limited production would cost much
> > more.
> >
> > > >Look, I'm willing to argue a point, but not when you go off in
> > > >capitalist ranting.
> > >
>
> ---------------------
> Wow. WOW! First you say it only cost $300 per car then it's a cost for
> this a cost for that, I only meant mass production...I think someone
> has been looking at too many sunrises.
>
> Kevin Tarr
> Trump high, lead low
>
Dawn Falcon
