At 04:15 PM 12/26/01 +0100 J. van Baardwijk wrote:
>I do not think so. I believe it is more like:
>- Arabs attack Israel
>- Israel retaliates in revenge
>- Arabs retaliate for that
>- Israel strikes back
>- etcetera...
ROTFLMAO!
"Israel retaliates in revenge?????" And you wonder why people start to
think that you might be anti-Semitic! I'll drop you a hint - positively
ridiculous insults of Israel (which is closely identified with Judaisim
itself), like this one go a looooooong ways.
Jeroen please get a history book describing the Yom Kippur War. The
joint Arab attack on Israel's Day of Atonement, when the entire country is
basically shut down, has to rank as one of the most despicable acts in the
entire history of organized warfare.
And after all that, Israel was just seeking *revenge*!!!!!! Hah!
Try:
Arabs attack Israel
Israel barely manages to survive attacks
Some Arabs sign peace Treaty with Israel and get their land back
Some Arabs *refuse to sign peace Treaty,* and do not get their land back.
Jeroen, with the above comment, you have abandoned all pretext of
rationality on this subject. Please come back when you intend to be
serious about this.
JDG
__________________________________________________________
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ICQ #3527685
"Our campaign against international terrorism does not represent some
sort of 'clash of civilizations.' Instead, it is a clash between
civilization and those who would destroy it." -Amb. Richard N. Haass
