In a message dated 12/31/01 7:38:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << > > I note that you accused me of "gross misinterpretation of history" in > > your post, but did not bother to answer the question about the possible > > future history of a Palestinian state attacking its neighbours. > >All of which is less important than your revising of history.
Ah, so now I am a revisionist as well. I suppose that in the next few days you will also find a way to twist my words in such a way that you will be able to call me a Holocaust-denier. :-( >> If I read all of your posts correctly, you are ignoring certain historical facts when constructing your arguments. (Such as the fact that in the past half century, Israel has been attacked three times by Arab countries hell-bent on wiping her off the planet.) If your ignorance is innocent, then your perspective should be changed by a change in the facts upon which your views are founded. You do not acknowledge that you have erred, maintain that major changes in the facts your arguments are based on do not change the nature of your arguments and this constitutes revisionism. Jon
