In a message dated 3/4/02 10:08:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< A.I. and technology will begin to replace jobs at an accelerated rate, as 
the technological 'spike' causes technology to be able to replace more jobs 
than people can find employment, and job requirements will go up.  This will 
cause massive unemployment, as most people are not able to transition fast 
enough / learn higher job skills fast enough.  Technology will put the 
squeeze on _all_ types of employment high and low.  Since A.I.'s and 
Technology will be 'better' workers, and considerably cheaper,
most employers will replace most of their employee's with the 'more 
productive' technologies.  Somewhere in there economic collapse is bound to 
occur, which may slow the coming of the singularity but not stop it.  The way 
I see it, when 98% of all jobs have been replaced with technology, that will 
the 'event horizon'. >>

I'm almost unilaterally unimpressed with doomsday scenarios that hold 
inherent a fear of technology triumphing over humanity.  The framers of these 
theories frequently underestimate the power of the human survival instinct, 
human creativity and adaptability.  All indications are that intelligence 
tends to lend itself to adaptability, and humans do adapt. 

Historically, as technology has been developed that can replace human 
workers, the people who are crowded out of vocations by machines have found 
alternative ways of earning a living.  This trend has increased with our 
population and with the growing rapidity of technological advances.

Is it an unending cycle?  Probably not.  But we're still here, scraping away 
despite all the previous predictions of armagaeddon.  

Kneem, I strongly recommend that if you're interested in a glimpse of how 
current technology is affecting the world economy you read Thomas Friedman's 
latest book.  A new trade paperback edition was just released.  He targets 
countries like Iran, Malaysia and Thailand and discusses not only how they 
fit into the new global economy, but also how their attitudes may be shaping 
the way their national economies handle upcoming decades. 

Jon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Reply via email to