On 25 Jan 2003 at 6:56, Erik Reuter wrote: > _Skeptical Environmentalist_ by Bjoern Lomborg presents an > interesting viewpoint about environmentalist claims, makes some > apparently reasonable counter claims and gives references to relevant > studies. Lomborg has been unfairly attacked by a number of people for, > as far as I can tell, daring to give the environmental literature a > critical reading and offering an alternative viewpoint. It seems to me > that there could be two reasonable responses by Lomborg's critics: (1) > write detailed critiques of Lomborg's points with references to > scientific literature, possibly in book form, or (2) for a scientist, > pick one or more of Lomborg's points, perform the necessary > experiments and modeling to prove the point wrong, and publish the > study in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. But I am not aware of any > of the critics employing either of these approaches.
Oh I don't know...maybe the article which spared this all off? I still don't think you've read it given the way you're carrying the banner for the man. *exasperated sigh* Andy Dawn Falcon _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
