On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 06:11:17PM -0000, Andrew Crystall wrote: > It well might be the publishers fault, but the book was SOLD as hard > science. I see that as a problem.
What does "sold as hard science" mean? The copy I read came from the library, but it had what I assume to be the commercial cover on it, and it was clear to me that it was a book reviewing and critiquing environmentalist claims. I saw nothing that led me to believe it was a peer-reviewed paper of the type that appear in scientific journals. -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
