----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Coffey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 5:59 PM Subject: Re: Catholicism Re: james ossuary a fake - scientists
> > One very interesting interpritation I have come across ( and give a lot of > credibility to) has to do with the "unleveness" of the bread. And the effects > that wine can have. Without the yeast unleven bread can contain quite a bit > of argot, a fungus that grows on grains. Argot contains sylisiben which is an > halucinagen. It might be that Jesus intent was for his disiples to reach a > "spiritual" state by ingesting sylisiben and achohaul. While this is contrary > to the beliefs of most christians it is not actualy very extream as religious > practices go. It certainly does make the whole buisness make a lot more > sence. It gives it purpous which is otherwise quite contirved. I have a problem with that. It contradicts what we know from early writings. For example, when Communion is discussed by Paul, the very thought of becoming drunk on communion wine was scandalous. Since his letters were reverently copied and passed by the early church, its hard to believe that he would not either 1) accept the practice or 2) attack those that teach that this practice was correct. Rather, he simply mentions that he heard some folks were doing it, and was shocked that they would do such a bad thing. Dan M. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l