"John D. Giorgis" wrote:
...
>
> Bob Z. said that no Democrat defended Clinton on this.
>
> In my mind, Bob Z.'s claim is patently absurd. Many Democrats did argue
> that any man would lie about adultery, and the only possible reason for
> making such a claim was to attempt to mitigate the charges against Clinton,
> and as such, defend him.
John--
I think you are splitting hairs here. I believe that
everybody else in this exchange is interpreting "defended Clinton"
as "said that Clinton was right to lie". You seem to be using it
here in the broader sense of "made any argument in support of
Clinton". With this sense, you are of course right.
Congratulations, you've won an argument. Unfortunately,
it was not WITH anybody, since we seem to be using words
differently. : )
---David
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
