The always intelligent Juan Cole compares Heroes and 24 to real world 
political meme systems in America.

Slight Spoilerage Ensues:

************************************************************************
http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2007/05/30/heroes/


NBC's hit series "Heroes" was the most-watched new show on network 
television this year despite its demanding plot lines and stretches of 
subtitled Japanese. Its season finale, which aired May 21, dominated 
the 9 p.m. time slot. What explains the show's popularity, especially 
with younger viewers? I think it is that, like the Fox thriller "24," 
"Heroes" is a response to Sept. 11 and the rise of international 
terrorism. But while "24" skews to the right politically, "Heroes" 
seems like a left-wing response to those events. In fact, it functions 
as a thoughtful critique of Vice President Dick Cheney's doctrine on 
counterterrorism.
In Bush and Cheney's "war on terror," the evildoers are external and 
are clearly discernible. In "Heroes," each person agonizes over the 
evil within, a point of view more common on the political left than on 
the right. Each of the flawed characters is capable of both nobility 
and iniquity. In Bush's vision, the main threat remains rival states 
(Saddam's Iraq, Ahmadinejad's Iran). States are absent from "Heroes," 
as though irrelevant. "Heroes" makes terrorism a universal and 
psychological issue rather than one attached to a clash of 
civilizations or to a particular race.

In its commentary on terror, "Heroes" thus avoids the caffeinated 
Islamophobia of "24." And at a time when "24," a favorite of older 
Republicans, is fading in the ratings, "Heroes" may also be a better 
guide to where the thinking of the young, post-Bush generation is 
heading when it comes to terror. It's certainly where their eyes are 
going. NBC's "Heroes" runs opposite Fox's "24" on Monday nights and 
snags a higher total of younger viewers, while the median age of "24" 
viewers keeps rising. As "Heroes" star Adrian Pasdar, who plays 
politician Nathan Petrelli, explained in an interview before this 
season's finale, "On Monday nights we own the demographics." He was 
referring to winning the ratings battle among the all-important 18-49 
age group that advertisers love.

"Heroes" posits a world in which a small number of persons have been 
born with extraordinary powers drawn from the standard science fiction 
repertory. The powers include levitating objects, mind reading, 
flying, miraculous healing, bursting into flames and, as with the 
painter Isaac Mendez (Santiago Cabrera), prophesying the future. The 
plot that drives the first season has to do with a prophetic painting 
by Mendez that shows New York City being blown up. The bomb is not 
mechanical but is a human being, a mutant, who cannot control his 
powers and will ultimately explode in the midst of the city if not 
stopped. For much of the season the mutants do not know exactly who 
will explode or when, but they know it will happen unless they prevent 
it.

The prospect of a walking bomb blowing up New York sets in motion at 
least three distinct reactions. The first, spearheaded by the 
middle-aged Noah Bennet (Jack Coleman) of Odessa, Texas, aims at 
mobilizing the mutants to become the "Heroes" of the show's title and 
stop the explosion. A second effort is that of a Japanese computer 
programmer who daydreams of being a samurai warrior. Hiro Nakamura 
(Masi Oka) can sometimes bend space and time, depending on his 
strength of will, and has seen the destruction of New York during a 
journey to the future. He is accompanied on his quest to save New York 
by his friend Ando Masahashi (James Kyson Lee).

Dogging the "Heroes" is evil mutant and serial killer Sylar. He wants 
to kill Noah Bennet's adopted daughter, the otherwise virtually 
indestructible cheerleader Claire (Hayden Panettiere). For reasons 
that are too complicated to explain quickly, her survival is key to 
thwarting the explosion (hence the slogan, "Save the cheerleader, save 
the world.")

Meanwhile, a third camp of wealthy and powerful figures, clearly on 
the political right, decide that the explosion cannot be avoided and 
must therefore be exploited to instill new spine and discipline into 
the soft American public. This clique, led by a Las Vegas mobster 
named Linderman (Malcolm McDowell), includes Angela Petrelli, the 
mother of Nathan and Peter Petrelli, both mutants. The Linderman 
faction strives to put Nathan Petrelli into office as a New York 
congressman by rigging the election, convinced that he will be in a 
position to lead America as a strong man after Gotham's immolation.

Some bloggers have detected overtones of Sept. 11 conspiracy 
theorizing in this plot element. A fringe among the American public 
has become convinced that the Bush administration either knew about 
the Sept. 11 attacks beforehand and deliberately declined to stop them 
because it saw a political opportunity to regiment the country in the 
aftermath -- or that it actively conspired to bring down the twin 
towers.

The plot of "Heroes," however, does not really echo these conspiracy 
theories. Though the right-wingers on "Heroes" do use fear to their 
political advantage, there is little indication that Linderman and 
Mrs. Petrelli are involved in a plot to blow New York up or even 
actively desire that outcome, and they in any case are not the U.S. 
government. They seem simply to be convinced that the prophesied event 
is unpreventable and that the best should be made of it. As they 
define "the best," it is positioning Nathan Petrelli to play populist 
politics, perhaps of the Mussolini sort. (Admittedly, in the last 
episode this season, Claire Bennet accuses Angela Petrelli of 
interfering with attempts to forestall the explosion, but this motif 
remains ambiguous).

I think it is more helpful to see "Heroes" as a broader philosophical 
critique of the Bush and Cheney approach to the war on terror. The 
Bush administration sees the world as polarized between white hats and 
black turbans. Convinced that terrorist groups are gunning for the 
United States, and that another major attack will be hard to avoid, 
Bush and Cheney have responded in two ways.

At home, they have taken away key American civil liberties and created 
a more authoritarian society. Bush spokesman Ari Fleischer famously 
said after Sept. 11 and the firing of (insufficiently nationalist) 
comedian Bill Maher by ABC that such controversies are "reminders to 
all Americans that they need to watch what they say, watch what they 
do. This is not a time for remarks like that; there never is." That 
astonishing pronouncement presaged the gutting of key constitutional 
liberties in Bush's misnamed Patriot Act.

Abroad, the administration has imposed Cheney's "1 percent doctrine," 
which, according to journalist Ron Suskind, holds that if there is 
even a 1 percent chance that terrorists will, for instance, acquire 
nuclear weapons, then the U.S. government must act as though it is a 
certainty. This doctrine underpinned the invasion and occupation of 
Iraq, which turned out to be free of both WMDs and a nuclear weapons 
program. Bush and Cheney unleashed a rogue's gallery of Torquemadas, 
mercenaries, kidnappers and hit men against their enemies, throwing 
the rule of law to the winds and hatching such scandals as Abu Ghraib. 
Salon's Gary Kamiya called this doctrine a "license to lie."

The program "24," which debuted just two months after 9/11, seems to 
endorse that worldview. On "24," "good guys" quite often need to do 
bad things. Jack Bauer, the hero of the show, tortures terrorists for 
information and was lauded for it from the stage during the recent 
Republican presidential debate.

The creator of "Heroes," Tim Kring, has rejected this black-and-white, 
"24"-style worldview in favor of something very different. In fact, as 
he told comics blogger Jonah Weiland in an interview, he had initially 
planned to have a Middle Eastern character as the terrorist threat but 
dropped that scenario. His terrorist threat is murky and various, his 
world multicultural and morally ambiguous.

His heroes aren't even white hats. Unlike most classic comic-book 
superheroes, NBC's "Heroes" cannot control their powers. Many of them 
have Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde aspects. They sometimes do harm, whether 
unintentionally or deliberately. Niki Sanders (played by Ali Larter), 
for instance, is a Las Vegas webcam stripper who, under stress, is 
taken over by an alter ego named Jessica who commits bloody mayhem. 
Ted Sprague (Matthew John Armstrong) is radioactive and 
unintentionally gives his wife cancer, but he also consciously 
threatens to go thermonuclear.

The powers of the heroes and their unpredictable consequences function 
as an allegory for the asymmetric threats generated by contemporary 
technology. They reflect the anxieties of an era when Timothy McVeigh 
can use some farm fertilizer to blow up the Murrah Federal Building in 
Oklahoma City, when Internet hackers threaten to open the sluices of 
the Hoover Dam, when the cultists of Aum Shinrikyo can poison hundreds 
on the Tokyo subway with homemade sarin gas, and when a handful of 
expatriate Arab engineers based in Germany can turn jetliners into 
flying bombs. Technology is advancing with such rapidity that it is 
making each individual far more powerful than in the past and 
bestowing on each individual new capacities that surely not all will 
deal with responsibly. This passing of a technological threshold, in 
which a handful of terrorists with a suitcase bomb could potentially 
destroy a city, will be a particular burden for younger Americans, the 
kind who prefer "Heroes" to "24," since it will help define the 
future.

"Heroes" also acknowledges the subjectivity of any discussion of 
"terror." The show's moral vision is far too nuanced to give aid and 
comfort to American nationalists. The serial killer in the cast, 
Sylar, played by Zachary Quinto, is the closest thing "Heroes" has to 
a pure villain. He seeks out and removes the brains of the other 
mutants. In the season finale, when it is clear that Peter Petrelli 
(Milo Ventimiglia) is the mutant who is in danger of losing control of 
himself and destroying New York, even Sylar's wickedness becomes 
ambiguous. Sylar, in a position to rub out Petrelli before the latter 
explodes, realizes that were he to destroy the time-bomb mutant, he 
would turn out to be the true hero. He wants to kill Petrelli and save 
New York, but for the wrong reasons.

What happens next is an implicit argument against Cheney's 1 percent 
doctrine. Just before Sylar can make himself into a perverse sort of 
hero by killing Peter Petrelli, Hiro Nakamura runs Sylar through with 
his samurai sword. Nakamura saves Petrelli, but New York remains 
endangered. Likewise, cheerleader Claire Bennet is in a position to 
shoot the human bomb (who once saved her from Sylar) and so to prevent 
the blast, and Peter Petrelli himself, fearing his own power, implores 
her to do so. She does not take the shot. Both of these plot twists 
could be seen as decisive rejections of deploying evil to forestall 
disaster, and of Cheney's impoverished view of human nature.

Ultimately, Peter's brother, Nathan the politician, who can fly, 
swoops down and grabs Peter. Instead of following through on a scheme 
hatched by his mother and Mr. Linderman to have him emerge as a soft 
dictator in the aftermath of the apocalyptic conflagration, Nathan 
ascends with Peter into the heavens. The explosion lights up the night 
sky above New York harmlessly. Tim Kring, who has spoken of wanting a 
redemptive ending to the season's story line, is apparently conveying 
the Gandhian message that compassion and brotherly self-sacrifice are 
more effective in preventing terrorism than naked ambition and 
hard-line tactics.

Of the three elements of storytelling -- plot, character and 
setting -- science fiction emphasizes setting far more than most 
fiction. And in this genre, setting is pregnant with clues for the 
significance of the story. The setting of "Heroes" is global. 
Characters are drawn not only from small-town and urban America, but 
from Tokyo's manga (adult comic books) subculture and from Calcutta's 
community of biologists. Leading authors in the cyberpunk genre of 
science fiction such as William Gibson in his best-selling 1996 novel, 
"Idoru" (centered on a virtual reality Japanese pop star) had already 
pointed to the salience of Japan for American youth culture. Amitav 
Ghosh's "Calcutta Chromosome" (1997), a thriller about the emergence 
of a DNA sequence that can shift parts of a personality from one 
individual to another, had signaled India's new technological chic.

But these settings are more than mere homage to themes of 
globalization in cyberpunk science fiction. The international cast 
also likely stands proxy for the increasing technological savvy of the 
rest of the world, for good or ill, creating new challenges for a 
United States that is no longer a combination of isolated island and 
impregnable fortress. An older generation of Americans may associate 
the global South with backwardness, but younger viewers (and the 
screenwriters who dream for them) recognize that sophisticated 
computer viruses are invented in the Philippines and genetically 
engineered crops are likely to come from "Genome Valley" near 
Hyderabad, India.

Rather than respond with jingoism, however, the globalized vision of 
"Heroes" sees Japanese and Indian characters as potential saviors. 
Kring said in his interview with Weiland, "Again, it was part of the 
theme to try and depict people from different parts of the world in 
positive ways." Rejecting the "America-first" unilateralism of Bush, 
"Heroes" firmly chooses multilateral efforts in the fight against 
terror and refuses to give up on any character or culture as beyond 
redemption.

*******************************************************************************



xponent

Informed Comment Maru

rob


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to