From: Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: the size restrictions for FAT and ext2fs stage1.5 Date: 08 Mar 1999 21:35:16 -0600 > I didn't mean to imply that I wouldn't bother to try at all... I'll > definitely do my best to fit LBA support into the stage1, if it's > possible. Is LBA support so diffcult? I don't know LBA well, so I'm just asking. > I was only suggesting blocklist_stage1_5 if you have a big stage2, and > you're not using some other stage1_5. I see. I prefer using stage1.5. I have already implemented self-loading stage2, but I'll discard it and make e2fs_stage1_5 useful. Some days ago, I wrote a test program to install a boot loader in the boot loader inode, so that will not take much time. Thanks, OKUJI ---------------------------------------------------------------------- OKUJI Yoshinori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ^o-o^ http://duff.kuicr.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~okuji (in English) m /
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT and ext2fs stage1.5 Gordon Matzigkeit
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT and ext2fs stage1... OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT and ext2fs st... Gordon Matzigkeit
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT and ext2f... OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT and e... Gordon Matzigkeit
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT ... OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: the size restrictions for ... Gordon Matzigkeit
- Re: the size restrictions for ... Gordon Matzigkeit
- Re: the size restrictions for ... OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: the size restrictions for ... Gordon Matzigkeit
- Re: the size restrictions for ... OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: the size restrictions for ... Gordon Matzigkeit
- Re: the size restrictions for ... OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT and ext2fs stage1... OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT and ext2fs st... Gordon Matzigkeit
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT and ext2fs stage1... Gordon Matzigkeit
