Re: the size restrictions for FAT and ext2fs stage1.5

[Gordon Matzigkeit]

>>>>> OKUJI Yoshinori writes:

 OY>   I have one question: should the rest of stage2 be loaded by
 OY> stage1?  Or by stage2 itself?

I would prefer you make the rest loaded by the stage2 itself.  This
makes sense to me, because it means that the stage1 doesn't need to be
changed, and would only contain block lists for the first 4KB of the
stage2.

That means that only grubinst (or equivalent) and the stage2 needs to
know about the extended blocklist.

Thanks for asking,

-- 
 Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  //\ I'm a FIG (http://www.fig.org/)
Committed to freedom and diversity \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/)