>>>>> OKUJI Yoshinori writes: >> I didn't mean to imply that I wouldn't bother to try at >> all... I'll definitely do my best to fit LBA support into the >> stage1, if it's possible. OY> Is LBA support so diffcult? I don't know LBA well, so I'm just OY> asking. I don't know it well, either. I have some preliminary code in shared_src/asm.S, but it doesn't seem to detect LBA correctly (even though I do things according to Ralf Brown's interrupt list). It probably won't ever work until somebody with thorough knowledge in this area can look at it, or else I get access to a machine where I can test things. -- Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> //\ I'm a FIG (http://www.fig.org/) Committed to freedom and diversity \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/)
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT and ext2fs stage1.5 OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT and ext2fs stage1... Gordon Matzigkeit
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT and ext2fs st... OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT and ext2f... Gordon Matzigkeit
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT and e... OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT ... Gordon Matzigkeit
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT ... Gordon Matzigkeit
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT ... OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT ... Gordon Matzigkeit
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT ... OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT ... Gordon Matzigkeit
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT ... OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT and ext2fs stage1.5 OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT and ext2fs stage1... Gordon Matzigkeit
- Re: the size restrictions for FAT and ext2fs stage1.5 Gordon Matzigkeit
